The same retention estimator applied to non-proctored assessment yields an opposite-signed 85% increase in odds of correct response on AI-susceptible items¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the non-proctored random-assignment subsample, AI-susceptible items become more likely to be answered correctly after ChatGPT's release, by 5.61% per quarter on the log-odds scale (85% cumulative increase). → Rismanchian 2026
Evidence¶
Rismanchian 2026¶
Rismanchian, S., Uzun, H., Matayoshi, J., Cosyn, E., & Kurd-Misto, E. (2026). Faster Completion, Less Learning: Generative AI Reduced Study Time on Math Problems and the Knowledge They Build. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21629 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.21629
q2 · i? · causal · r2
The same logistic ramp estimator applied to the non-proctored retention sample (3,223 item-level observations) yields "β= + 0.0561, p= 0.021" and an 85% cumulative odds increase — opposite in sign to the proctored result.
"AI-susceptible items becomemorelikely to be answered correctly after ChatGPT's release than AI-resistant items, by 5.61% per quarter on the log-odds scale in the random-assignment subsample (β= + 0.0561, p= 0.021). The cumulative effect is an 85% increase in the odds of correct response."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- College students' learning time on AI-susceptible word problems declines 2.80% per quarter relative to graph-based problems after ChatGPT's release, cumulating to 26.9% over eleven quarters — related
- On randomly assigned proctored retention items, odds of correct response on AI-susceptible items decline 25.0% cumulatively after ChatGPT's release — related
- The post-ChatGPT response-time divergence on AI-susceptible items vanishes entirely under proctored assessment — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
nonproctored-retention-reversal-85-percent |
title |
The same retention estimator applied to non-proctored assessment yields an opposite-signed 85% increase in odds of correct response on AI-susceptible items |
description |
The same retention estimator applied to non-proctored assessment yields an opposite-signed 85% increase in odds of correct response on AI-susceptible items |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — rismanchian-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.