On randomly assigned proctored retention items, odds of correct response on AI-susceptible items decline 25.0% cumulatively after ChatGPT's release¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Logistic item and quarter fixed-effects models estimate a 2.61% per-quarter decline in log-odds of correct response on AI-susceptible items in proctored conditions, cumulating to a 25.0% odds reduction (odds-ratio multiplier 0.75). → Rismanchian 2026
Evidence¶
Rismanchian 2026¶
Rismanchian, S., Uzun, H., Matayoshi, J., Cosyn, E., & Kurd-Misto, E. (2026). Faster Completion, Less Learning: Generative AI Reduced Study Time on Math Problems and the Knowledge They Build. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21629 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.21629
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Logistic fixed-effects model on 6,698 randomly assigned extra retention item observations across 66 topics and 22 quarters, proctored conditions. Estimate "β=− 0.0260, p= 0.037"; randomization inference within difficulty quartiles gave p= 0.027.
"a 2.61% per-quarter decline in the log-odds of correctly answering AI-susceptible items relative to AI-resistant items in proctored conditions ( β=− 0.0260, p= 0.037), accumulating to a 25.0% cumulative reduction in the odds of correct response"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The post-ChatGPT learning-time decline follows an age gradient: largest in high school (31.3% cumulative), small in middle school (9.0%), and undetectable in Grade 5 — related
- College students' learning time on AI-susceptible word problems declines 2.80% per quarter relative to graph-based problems after ChatGPT's release, cumulating to 26.9% over eleven quarters — related
- The same retention estimator applied to non-proctored assessment yields an opposite-signed 85% increase in odds of correct response on AI-susceptible items — related
- The post-ChatGPT response-time divergence on AI-susceptible items vanishes entirely under proctored assessment — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
proctored-retention-odds-decline-25-percent |
title |
On randomly assigned proctored retention items, odds of correct response on AI-susceptible items decline 25.0% cumulatively after ChatGPT's release |
description |
On randomly assigned proctored retention items, odds of correct response on AI-susceptible items decline 25.0% cumulatively after ChatGPT's release |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — rismanchian-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.