Claims

Nurses' competence in effective implementation of evidence comprises evaluating and reflecting on outcomes, contextual understanding and analysis, and facilitating and managing change in practice

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Synthesised finding 4 aggregated 30 qualitative findings into three categories describing nurses' competence in effective implementation of evidence. → Hietaniemi 2026

Evidence

Hietaniemi 2026

Hietaniemi, A.‐M., Ylimäki, S., Härkönen, H., Hannila, H.‐M., Tuomikoski, A.‐M., Oikarinen, A., Jansson, M., Pölkki, T., Kanste, O. & Kääriäinen, M. (2026). Nurses' Experiences and Perceptions of Evidence‐Based Healthcare Competence: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70399

q3 · i? · qualitative · r3

JBI meta‐aggregation synthesising 30 findings from the included qualitative studies into three categories. The review reports that "Nurses' competence in effective implementation of evidence was formed by three categories", graded low on ConQual after downgrading for dependability and credibility.

"Nurses' competence in effective implementation of evidence was formed by three categories. The categories were: evaluating and reflecting on outcomes, contextual understanding and analysis, facilitating and managing change in practice."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.