Claims

OCR was implemented with adequate to high fidelity in treatment schools, with no evidence of contamination in control schools

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The combined professional development and classroom fidelity-of-implementation model indicated adequate to high fidelity across treatment schools in both years and no evidence of contamination in control schools. → Vaden-Kiernan 2016

Evidence

Vaden-Kiernan 2016

Vaden-Kiernan, M., Borman, G., Caverly, S., Bell, N., Ruiz de Castilla, V., Sullivan, K., & Fleming, G. (2016). Findings from a Multi-Year Scale-Up Effectiveness Trial of Open-Court Reading (Imagine It!). SREE Spring 2016 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED567512

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Implementation study across two years (304 teachers: 147 Year 1, 157 Year 2; 49.4% from treatment schools), with fidelity captured via classroom observations, interviews, and surveys, analyzed as a latent construct of dosage, adherence, quality of delivery, and student responsiveness. No effect size is printed.

"Implementation study results from the combined (professional development and classroom) OCR fidelity of implementation model indicated that the program was implemented with adequate to high levels of fidelity across the treatment schools in the first and second year and no evidence of contamination in the control schools in the study."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.