SNAPPS outperformed the one-minute preceptor and both outperformed traditional clinical teaching for clinical reasoning skill¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 SNAPPS, compared with traditional clinical teaching, had a statistically significant large effect on clinical reasoning skill improvement (SMD 1.65), and SNAPPS compared with OMP had a statistically meaningful effect (SMD 1.013). → Delavari S 2024
Evidence¶
Delavari S 2024¶
Delavari S, Barzkar F, Rikers MJP, Pourahmadi M, Soltani Arabshahi SK, Keshtkar A, Dargahi H, Yaghmaei M, Monajemi A. (2024). Teaching and learning clinical reasoning skill in undergraduate medical students: A scoping review. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309606
q3 · i3 · review · r3
The review reports, from an included study attributed to reference [75], that SNAPPS versus traditional clinical teaching yielded SMD = 1.65 and SNAPPS versus OMP yielded SMD = 1.013, both statistically significant. The review attributes this to reference [75].
"SNAPSS, compared with traditional clinical teaching, had a statistically significant large effect (SMD, 1.65 [0.932–0.367); P = 0.001) on clinical reasoning skill improvement; SNAPPS, compared with OMP, had a statistically meaningful effect on clinical reasoning skill (1.013 [0.355–1.672; P = 0.005)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Blended teaching (TBL plus feedback and reflection) outperformed traditional bedside teaching on clinical reasoning performance — related
- SNAPPS is reported as superior to the One-Minute Preceptor model in enhancing clinical reasoning — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- A JBI-guided scoping review identified eight structured clinical teaching models for healthcare trainees published between 2000 and 2025, from 26 included articles — related
- Supporting evidence is unevenly distributed across the eight clinical teaching models, with OMP and SNAPPS the most extensively studied — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.