Claims

Other online technologies (blogging, podcasts, wikis, ARS) show mixed or null effects on grades and exam scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Case studies showed no improvement in grades with collaborative wikis, and an RCT found no significant effect of podcasts on written or practical exam scores. → Mącznik Aleksandra K. 2015

Evidence

Mącznik Aleksandra K. 2015

Mącznik Aleksandra K., Ribeiro Daniel Cury, Baxter G. David. (2015). Online technology use in physiotherapy teaching and learning: a systematic review of effectiveness and users’ perceptions. BMC Medical Education. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4587774/

q2 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review synthesis of studies on wikis, blogging, and podcasts. Wikis showed "no improvement in grades"; blogging demonstrated clinical reasoning and metacognitive skills; podcasts showed "no significant effect on written nor practical exam scores."

"Case studies have shown no improvement in grades using collaborative wikis [35], but that students demonstrated a range of clinical reasoning and metacognitive skills using blogging [36]. Another RCT study [37] using podcasts found no significant effect on written nor practical exam scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.