Claims

Wiki and blog effects on academic performance are stronger at K12 level (E++ = 0.845) than higher education (E++ = 0.71), with negative effect sizes occurring only in higher education studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 The effect size for K12 studies (E++ = 0.845) exceeds that for higher education studies (E++ = 0.71), and negative effect sizes appear only among higher education studies. → Ergul Sonmez 2021

Evidence

Ergul Sonmez 2021

Ergul Sonmez, E., & Cakir, H. (2021). Effect of Web 2.0 technologies on academic performance: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 5(1), 108-127. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.161

q2 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis by education level across the 19 included studies, 78.9% of which used university samples. The printed effect sizes are E++ = 0.71 for higher education and E++ = 0.845 for K12, quoted as "0.71 and 0.845, respectively"; the authors state negative effect sizes belonged only to higher education contexts.

"The effect size values for higher education and K12 as two different education levels are 0.71 and 0.845, respectively, of which both values reflect the positive effect."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.