Claims

Students consistently overestimated how much they learned with answer-revealing images

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across experiments, students overestimated learning from images that helped them retrieve the answer. → van den Broek 2021

Evidence

van den Broek 2021

van den Broek, G., Van Gog, T., Jansen, E., Pleijsant, M., & Kester, L. (2021). Multimedia Effects During Retrieval Practice: Images That Reveal the Answer Reduce Vocabulary Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(8), 1587-1608. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000499

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Judgments of learning relative to actual posttest recall across the three classroom experiments; the article reports that "students consistently overestimated how much they learned with images that helped them retrieve the answer."

"students consistently overestimated how much they learned with images that helped them retrieve the answer."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id overestimating-learning-with-answer-revealing-images
title Students consistently overestimated how much they learned with answer-revealing images
description Students consistently overestimated how much they learned with answer-revealing images
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — van-den-broek-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.