Claims

Students incorrectly considered partially hinting images helpful

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students incorrectly judged images providing partial hints about the answer to be helpful (Experiments 2 and 3). → van den Broek 2021

Evidence

van den Broek 2021

van den Broek, G., Van Gog, T., Jansen, E., Pleijsant, M., & Kester, L. (2021). Multimedia Effects During Retrieval Practice: Images That Reveal the Answer Reduce Vocabulary Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(8), 1587-1608. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000499

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Judgments of learning in Experiments 2 and 3, where images provided partial hints; students "considered images that provided partial hints about the answer to be helpful" despite weaker recall.

"but—incor-rectly—considered images that provided partial hints about the answer to be helpful (Experiments 2 and 3)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id students-misjudge-hint-images-as-helpful
title Students incorrectly considered partially hinting images helpful
description Students incorrectly considered partially hinting images helpful
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — van-den-broek-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.