Compared to lecture-based learning, PACS-CBL produced the greatest improvement in practical skills exam scores, with 3D-PBL and PBL-CBL next at high evidence quality¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Versus LBL, PACS-CBL improved skills exam scores most (MD 18.81, 95% CI 17.46 to 20.16), followed by 3D-PBL (MD 7.84) and PBL-CBL (MD 7.42). → Gu Peng 2026
Evidence¶
Gu Peng 2026¶
Gu Peng, Xu Zhendong, Zhang Zheng, Wen Yonghao, Jia Yanqing, Du Ying, Wen Tianlin, Man Chao, Jia Zhiwei, Wu Yaohong, Li Wei. (2026). Comparative effectiveness of orthopedic teaching methods in China: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08582-4
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Network meta-analysis of practical skills exam scores from 39 studies, covering 9 teaching designs and 36 comparisons; the printed mean differences versus LBL are reported, with PACS-CBL rated low quality while 3D-PBL and PBL-CBL were rated high quality.
"Compared to LBL, PACS-CBL (MD 18.81, 95% CI 17.46 to 20.16) had the greatest improvement in skills exam scores, followed by 3D-PBL (MD 7.84, 95% CI 7.34 to 8.35) and PBL-CBL (MD 7.42, 95% CI 6.35 to 8.50)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- 3D-PBL showed the greatest improvement in communication skills versus lecture-based learning, rated high-quality evidence — related
- 3D-PBL is the most effective orthopedic teaching method across all measured outcomes in Chinese undergraduate and postgraduate education — related
- CBL significantly enhances clinical practice skills compared with LBL (RR = 2.39) — related
- MDT-CBL produced the greatest increase in learning interest versus lecture-based learning, but 3D-PBL was the only top-ranked option with high-quality evidence — related
- Emerging teaching methods (PBL, CBL, FC) significantly improve dental students' exam scores compared to lecture-based learning — a broader claim this one bears on
- In Chinese neurology training, CBL, PBL, TBL, FCM and EBM each significantly improve theoretical exam scores compared with lecture-based learning — related
- Compared to lecture-based learning, PACS-CBL produced the greatest improvement in theoretical exam scores, with 3D-PBL and 3D-CBL next, but PACS-CBL evidence was low quality — related
- PBL significantly improves clinical skill scores compared with lecture-based learning in medical education — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.