Perceived academic dishonesty is not directly related to ChatGPT use frequency or intention to use¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? PAD was not directly related to use frequency (β = 0.04, p =.22) or intention to use ChatGPT (β = −0.05, p =.33); hypotheses H2a and H2b were rejected. → Ortiz-Bonnin 2025

Evidence¶

Ortiz-Bonnin 2025¶

Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Hypothesis test in the same 468-student survey mediation analysis. The article reports PAD "was not directly related to use frequency (β = 0.04, p =.22) or intention to use ChatGTP (β = − 0.05, p =.33)"; no effect size is printed, so the null is not evidence of equivalence.

"Second, PAD was not directly related to use frequency (β = 0.04, p =.22) or intention to use ChatGTP (β = − 0.05, p =.33), thus rejecting H2a and H2b."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Perceived risk mediates the relationship between perceived academic dishonesty and ChatGPT usage (indirect-only mediation) — related
• Students with higher perceived academic dishonesty perceive greater risk in using ChatGPT — related
• Perceived risk of using ChatGPT is negatively associated with both use frequency and intention to use among undergraduates — related
• ChatGPT use frequency and intention to use are strongly positively correlated — related
• Cheating tendency significantly predicts AI-assisted academic dishonesty, and the association is stronger at higher levels of AI use — related