Claims

Perceived risk mediates the relationship between perceived academic dishonesty and ChatGPT usage (indirect-only mediation)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? PAD is indirectly associated with use frequency through perceived risk (95% CI [−0.05, −0.01]). → Ortiz-Bonnin 2025 q3 i? PAD is indirectly associated with intention to use through perceived risk (95% CI [−0.11, −0.02]). → Ortiz-Bonnin 2025 (2)

Evidence

Ortiz-Bonnin 2025

Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Bootstrapped mediation analysis (10,000 samples, bias-corrected CIs) in Jamovi on the 468-student sample. The article reports the indirect effect on use frequency with "95% CI [-0.05, − 0.01]", excluding zero; classified as indirect-only mediation per Meule (2019).

"Third, PAD was indirectly associated with both use frequency (95% CI [-0.05, − 0.01]) and intention to use (95% CI [-0.11, − 0.02]) through perceived risk."

Ortiz-Bonnin 2025 (2)

Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Same bootstrapped mediation model; the indirect effect on intention to use had "95% CI [-0.11, − 0.02]", excluding zero, supporting H3b. Direct and total effects were not significant.

"Third, PAD was indirectly associated with both use frequency (95% CI [-0.05, − 0.01]) and intention to use (95% CI [-0.11, − 0.02]) through perceived risk."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id perceived-risk-mediation-pad-chatgpt
title Perceived risk mediates the relationship between perceived academic dishonesty and ChatGPT usage (indirect-only mediation)
description Perceived risk mediates the relationship between perceived academic dishonesty and ChatGPT usage (indirect-only mediation)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — ortiz-bonnin-2025, ortiz-bonnin-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.