Perceived risk mediates the relationship between perceived academic dishonesty and ChatGPT usage (indirect-only mediation)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? PAD is indirectly associated with use frequency through perceived risk (95% CI [−0.05, −0.01]). → Ortiz-Bonnin 2025
q3 i? PAD is indirectly associated with intention to use through perceived risk (95% CI [−0.11, −0.02]). → Ortiz-Bonnin 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Ortiz-Bonnin 2025¶
Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Bootstrapped mediation analysis (10,000 samples, bias-corrected CIs) in Jamovi on the 468-student sample. The article reports the indirect effect on use frequency with "95% CI [-0.05, − 0.01]", excluding zero; classified as indirect-only mediation per Meule (2019).
"Third, PAD was indirectly associated with both use frequency (95% CI [-0.05, − 0.01]) and intention to use (95% CI [-0.11, − 0.02]) through perceived risk."
Ortiz-Bonnin 2025 (2)¶
Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Same bootstrapped mediation model; the indirect effect on intention to use had "95% CI [-0.11, − 0.02]", excluding zero, supporting H3b. Direct and total effects were not significant.
"Third, PAD was indirectly associated with both use frequency (95% CI [-0.05, − 0.01]) and intention to use (95% CI [-0.11, − 0.02]) through perceived risk."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Perceived academic dishonesty is not directly related to ChatGPT use frequency or intention to use — related
- Students with higher perceived academic dishonesty perceive greater risk in using ChatGPT — related
- Perceived risk of using ChatGPT is negatively associated with both use frequency and intention to use among undergraduates — related
- Information risk perception is negatively associated with psychological and emotional support, daily life, and leisure and entertainment benefits — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
perceived-risk-mediation-pad-chatgpt |
title |
Perceived risk mediates the relationship between perceived academic dishonesty and ChatGPT usage (indirect-only mediation) |
description |
Perceived risk mediates the relationship between perceived academic dishonesty and ChatGPT usage (indirect-only mediation) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — ortiz-bonnin-2025, ortiz-bonnin-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.