Claims

Students report that Parole makes vocabulary learning permanent but time-consuming

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Interviewed students perceived the software as making learning permanent but requiring substantial time investment. → Yelbay Yılmaz 2015

Evidence

Yelbay Yılmaz 2015

Yelbay Yılmaz, Y. (2015). Learning vocabulary in a foreign language: A computer software based model attempt. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(2), 23-38. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105162

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Semi-structured interviews with five volunteer students (high, average, and low scorers) after the immediate post-test. High scorers reported that "once I click on the 'save' button I know that I will not forget it. It is permanent" while low scorers found the per-word time investment excessive.

"Low scoring students said that it needs a lot of time investment to deal with one word in the software and therefore they found it boring at times."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.