Parole users retained more vocabulary twelve weeks after instruction than control students¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 Experimental group students retained significantly more vocabulary on the delayed post-test. → Yelbay Yılmaz 2015

Evidence¶

Yelbay Yılmaz 2015¶

Yelbay Yılmaz, Y. (2015). Learning vocabulary in a foreign language: A computer software based model attempt. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(2), 23-38. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105162

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

The same mixed between-within ANOVA across the three testing times showed a significant group-by-time interaction, "F (2, 74) = 182.59, p <.05., η2 = .83", supporting that software users retained more words at delayed testing.

"The Wilks’ Lambda data shows that the difference in scores of the experimental and control groups based on the time variable (pre-test, immediate post-test, delayed post-test) is significant F (2, 74) = 182.59, p <.05., η2 = .83."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students using the Parole vocabulary software learned more words than control students over eight weeks — related
• Longer time spent in the Parole software correlates with more words learned and retained — related
• Students report that Parole makes vocabulary learning permanent but time-consuming — related
• PBL-taught learners showed significantly higher vocabulary retention on delayed post-tests in all modules except module 3 — related
• EFL students using Web 2.0 learner-created content scored significantly higher on a vocabulary post-test than a lecture-based control group — related