In a program combining coaching, deliberate practice, formative feedback, and enhanced supervision, 55% of residents and fellows with primary clinical reasoning deficits graduated in good standing¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Of 38 participants with primary clinical reasoning deficits in the Parsons et al. program, 21 (55%) successfully graduated in good standing, 12 (32%) remained in training with good standing, and 5 (13%) left without good standing. → Philip SJ 2026

Evidence¶

Philip SJ 2026¶

Philip SJ, Cholifatul UF, Felicia CC, Nooreen A. (2026). Strategies for remediating clinical reasoning skill deficits in underperforming residents: a scoping review. J Educ Eval Health Prof. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2026.23.3

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports, citing Parsons et al. (2024), a retrospective cross-sectional study of a remediation program for residents and fellows with primary clinical reasoning deficits incorporating "clinical coaching, deliberate practice, formative feedback, and enhanced supervision." Percentages are descriptive; no effect size is printed.

"Of the 38 participants, 21 (55%) successfully graduated in good standing, 12 (32%) remained in their training programs with good standing, and 5 (13%) left the program without achieving good standing."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In a standardized faculty-guidance and coaching remediation program, 96% of learners with clinical reasoning deficits passed reassessment — related
• Learner-related factors are the most frequently identified barriers to effective remediation of clinical reasoning skill deficits — related
• Across remediation programs reviewed, 55%–100% of residents successfully completed remediation and finished residency in good standing, while 4%–23% did not — a broader claim this one bears on