Claims

Across remediation programs reviewed, 55%–100% of residents successfully completed remediation and finished residency in good standing, while 4%–23% did not

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In nine studies reporting outcomes, 55%–100% of residents successfully completed remediation and finished their residency programs in good standing, whereas 4%–23% did not achieve good standing. → Philip SJ 2026

Evidence

Philip SJ 2026

Philip SJ, Cholifatul UF, Felicia CC, Nooreen A. (2026). Strategies for remediating clinical reasoning skill deficits in underperforming residents: a scoping review. J Educ Eval Health Prof. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2026.23.3

q2 · i? · review · r3

Narrative synthesis of the nine included studies that reported remediation outcomes. The review reports that "55%–100% of residents successfully completed remediation" and finished in good standing, while 4%–23% did not and either transferred or exited residency. No effect sizes are printed.

"Nine studies reported outcomes of their remediation programs [12,22,30-35,38]. Across these studies, 55%–100% of residents successfully completed remediation and were able to finish their residency programs in good standing."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.