For clinical thinking capacity in TACE teaching, PBL combined with CBL ranked best, followed by CBL alone¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the network meta-analysis of clinical thinking capacity, PBL in combination with CBL showed the best improvement, followed by CBL. → Yan Jingxin 2024

Evidence¶

Yan Jingxin 2024¶

Yan Jingxin, Wen Yonghao, Liu Xinlian, Deng Manjun, Ye Bin, Li Ting, Wang Huanwei, Jia Cui, Liao Jinsong, Zhang Lushun. (2024). The effectiveness of problem-based learning and case-based learning teaching methods in clinical practical teaching in TACE treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a bayesian network meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05615-8

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Bayesian network meta-analysis of clinical thinking capacity reported in 4 studies, with 5 comparisons across 5 interventions; no significant publication bias was found and no effect sizes are printed.

"PBL in combination with CBL showed the best improvement in the clinical thinking capacity, followed by CBL (Figure S9)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In TACE clinical teaching in China, combining PBL and CBL shows more effectiveness than other compared teaching methods across nine measured outcomes — a broader claim this one bears on
• For knowledge understanding degree and clinical practice capacity in TACE teaching, PBL combined with CBL ranked best, followed by PBL alone — related
• For method satisfaction degree in TACE teaching, PBL combined with CBL was the most satisfied among students, followed by PBL alone — related
• For learning interest and learning efficiency in TACE teaching, PBL combined with TBL ranked best, followed by PBL combined with CBL — related
• For practical skills examination scores in TACE teaching, PBL combined with TBL ranked best, followed by PBL alone — related