For knowledge understanding degree and clinical practice capacity in TACE teaching, PBL combined with CBL ranked best, followed by PBL alone¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr1–r2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the network meta-analysis of knowledge understanding degree, PBL in combination with CBL showed the best improvement, followed by PBL. → Yan Jingxin 2024
q2 i? In the network meta-analysis of clinical practice capacity, PBL in combination with CBL showed the best improvement, followed by PBL. → Yan Jingxin 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Yan Jingxin 2024¶
Yan Jingxin, Wen Yonghao, Liu Xinlian, Deng Manjun, Ye Bin, Li Ting, Wang Huanwei, Jia Cui, Liao Jinsong, Zhang Lushun. (2024). The effectiveness of problem-based learning and case-based learning teaching methods in clinical practical teaching in TACE treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a bayesian network meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05615-8
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Bayesian network meta-analysis of knowledge understanding degree reported in 2 studies, with 3 comparisons across 3 interventions; no significant publication bias was found and no effect sizes are printed.
"PBL in combination with CBL showed the best improvement in the knowledge understanding degree, followed by PBL (Figure S7)."
Yan Jingxin 2024 (2)¶
Yan Jingxin, Wen Yonghao, Liu Xinlian, Deng Manjun, Ye Bin, Li Ting, Wang Huanwei, Jia Cui, Liao Jinsong, Zhang Lushun. (2024). The effectiveness of problem-based learning and case-based learning teaching methods in clinical practical teaching in TACE treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a bayesian network meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05615-8
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1
Bayesian network meta-analysis of clinical practice capacity reported in 2 studies, with 3 comparisons across 3 interventions; no significant publication bias was found and no effect sizes are printed.
"PBL in combination with CBL showed the best improvement in the clinical practice capacity, followed by PBL (Figure S8)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- For clinical thinking capacity in TACE teaching, PBL combined with CBL ranked best, followed by CBL alone — related
- For literature reading ability in TACE teaching, PBL combined with CBL ranked best, followed by PBL alone — related
- For method satisfaction degree in TACE teaching, PBL combined with CBL was the most satisfied among students, followed by PBL alone — related
- For theoretical knowledge examination scores in TACE teaching, PBL combined with TBL ranked best, followed by PBL combined with CBL — related
- For learning interest and learning efficiency in TACE teaching, PBL combined with TBL ranked best, followed by PBL combined with CBL — related
- In TACE clinical teaching in China, combining PBL and CBL shows more effectiveness than other compared teaching methods across nine measured outcomes — a broader claim this one bears on
- For practical skills examination scores in TACE teaching, PBL combined with TBL ranked best, followed by PBL alone — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.