Nine experts rated the PBL-based civic education teaching material eligible for learning, with an average final score of 92%¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Expert assessment across linguists, presentation, media and material aspects averaged 92%, indicating eligibility for use in learning. → Wulandari 2018

Evidence¶

Wulandari 2018¶

Wulandari, T., Suharno, & Triyanto. (2018). Field trial analysis of teaching material civic education based on problem based learning (PBL) to improve student’s outcome. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(4), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.4.259

q2 · i? · design · r2

Expert validation in the Finding section: Table 2 prints linguists 92.5%, presentation 92.5%, media experts 95%, material experts 90%, average 92%. Assessment aspects were adapted from BNSP content, presentation, language and graphic eligibility.

"The assessment results are accumulated and get the average of final value 92%. It shows that the teaching material of Civic education based on PBL eligibility is used in learning."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A teacher assessment of the PBL-based material in the limited test rated all aspects 85%, declared eligible for learning — related
• Expert and student judgements rate the WEIEC application feasible, with Aiken's V of 0.80 from experts and 0.81 from students — related