Claims

A teacher assessment of the PBL-based material in the limited test rated all aspects 85%, declared eligible for learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the limited test, a teacher using a Likert scale 1-4 assessed content, material, evaluation, presentation, language and appearance at 85% overall. → Wulandari 2018

Evidence

Wulandari 2018

Wulandari, T., Suharno, & Triyanto. (2018). Field trial analysis of teaching material civic education based on problem based learning (PBL) to improve student’s outcome. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(4), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.4.259

q2 · i? · design · r2

Limited test with descriptive qualitative approach using Miles and Huberman's interactive analysis model; one fourth-grade class. Teacher assessment covered content, material, evaluation, presentation, language and appearance aspects.

"The assessment of teaching material on the limited test is carried out by a teacher using Likert scale 1 -4. The assessment of all aspects is 85% and can be declared eligible used in learning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.