Claims

Mean student test scores rose from pretest 62.46 to posttest 81.21 after using the PBL-based civic education material

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Descriptive pretest and posttest values of 62.46 and 81.21 were obtained in the limited test. → Wulandari 2018

Evidence

Wulandari 2018

Wulandari, T., Suharno, & Triyanto. (2018). Field trial analysis of teaching material civic education based on problem based learning (PBL) to improve student’s outcome. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(4), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.4.259

q2 · i? · design · r3

Limited test results reported in the Discussion section give the printed pretest and posttest values of 62.46 and 81.21; the histogram in Figure 1 shows the same values. These are descriptive means; no effect size is printed.

"The result of limited test obtains pretest and posttest values of 62.46 and 81.21. The result of t test is 0.000 < 0.05 so that it can be concluded that Civic education based on PBL can improve the students’ learning outcomes."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.