Claims

On a delayed delayed-post-test covering all 30 items, the PBL group (mean 23.80) outperformed the control group (mean 17.15)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In week 12, the experimental group with a mean score of 23.80 outperformed the control group that scored an overall mean of 17.15, on 99% confidence level. → Shafaei 2015

Evidence

Shafaei 2015

Shafaei, A., & Abdul Rahim, H. (2015). Does project-based learning enhance Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary recall and retention? Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(2), 83-99. https://www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr

q3 · i? · causal · r2

The delayed delayed-post-test in week 12 (11 weeks after the first post-test) was identical to the pre-test and combined questions on all 30 stimulus items in one session; the article reports Sig. < 0.01 with no effect size printed.

"Results show that the experimental group with a mean score of 23.80 outperformed the control group that scored an overall mean of 17.15, on 99% confidence level (Sig. < 0.01)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.