Claims

TBL students achieve significantly higher post-test final scores than LBL students in medical education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Students taught with TBL had significantly higher post-test final examination scores than students taught with LBL (SMD = 0.96). → Xie Zhi-Bo 2025

Evidence

Xie Zhi-Bo 2025

Xie Zhi-Bo, Cheng Xin-Yu, Li Xiao-Yan, Zhang Yi-Fan. (2025). Team based learning pedagogy enhances the education quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07175-x

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 28 studies comparing TBL and LBL final examination scores in medical education, using a random-effects model. The pooled analysis found "significantly higher post-test scores than students with LBL (SMD = 0.96, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.22".

"We found that students with TBL method had significantly higher post-test scores than students with LBL (SMD = 0.96, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.22, I2 = 93.4%, random-effects model)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.