Pedagogical resistance is rated lowest of the four resistance factors at every parental resistance level, while social and economic factors are rated highest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 Across all parents, the four resistance factors differ significantly, with the pedagogical factor rated significantly lower than social, economic and environmental factors. → Hadad 2020
q2 i? Within each resistance level (non-, passive, active), the pedagogical factor is rated lowest; among active resisters social resistance is highest. → Hadad 2020 (2)
Evidence¶
Hadad 2020¶
Hadad, S., Meishar-Tal, H., & Blau, I. (2020). The parents' tale: Why parents resist the educational use of smartphones at schools?. Computers & Education, 157, 103984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103984
q2 · i3 · associational · r2
Repeated-measures ANOVA on the Resistance Factors Questionnaire (n=220); Bonferroni comparisons showed the "pedagogical factor (M=2.83) was rated significantly lower than social (M=3.57), economic (M=3.45) and environmental resistance factors", with pη2=.232.
"Analysis of variance with repeated measures showed that a significant difference was found between the four resistance factors F (3,216) =73.80, p=.000, pη2=.232."
Hadad 2020 (2)¶
Hadad, S., Meishar-Tal, H., & Blau, I. (2020). The parents' tale: Why parents resist the educational use of smartphones at schools?. Computers & Education, 157, 103984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103984
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Separate repeated-measures ANOVAs per resistance group (Table 4): non-resistance F(3,231)=41.81, passive F(3,195)=18.09, active F(3,225)=28.14, all p=.000; among "passive and active resistance groups, social resistance overcame environmental resistance". No effect sizes beyond pη2 printed in table.
"Pedagogical resistance factor was found to be rated the lowest at all parental resistance levels. In addition, among parents who reported non -resistance, environmental resistance factor was rated lower compared to social and economic resistance factors."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Pedagogical and social resistance factors positively predict actual parental resistance, while an authoritative parenting style is a negative predictor — related
- Parenting style is associated with resistance level: authoritarian parents show the highest active resistance while most authoritative and permissive parents do not resist — related
- About two-thirds of surveyed parents resist educational smartphone use in schools, and more than half of them actively resist — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.