Claims

Pedagogical and social resistance factors positively predict actual parental resistance, while an authoritative parenting style is a negative predictor

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the final regression step, pedagogical (β=.319, p=.003) and social (β=.252, p=.014) resistance positively predict resistance level; authoritative style negatively predicts it (β=-.160, p=.020). → Hadad 2020

Evidence

Hadad 2020

Hadad, S., Meishar-Tal, H., & Blau, I. (2020). The parents' tale: Why parents resist the educational use of smartphones at schools?. Computers & Education, 157, 103984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103984

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Three-step linear regression (Table 7, n=220): the resistance factors "explained an additional 41.6% of the variance" and all variables together "explained 48.9% of variance in parental resistance level"; regression coefficients, not standardised effect sizes.

"In the third step, among the four resistance factors, pedagogical and social resistance factors were found to positively predict parents’ actual resistance. In addition, parents with an authoritative parenting style showed less resistance, while having a smartphone no longer predicted the parental resistance level."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.