Subjects appreciated the peer review intervention (average 4.0) while rating the chat session less positively (average 3.1)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Subjects liked the peer review intervention, rating it 4.0 on a five-point scale (SD 0.6). → Verstegen 2006 q2 i? Subjects were less positive about the chat session, rating it 3.1 on a five-point scale (SD 1.2). → Verstegen 2006 (2)

Evidence¶

Verstegen 2006¶

Verstegen, D.M.L., Barnard, Y.F. & Pilot, A. (2006). Which events can cause iteration in instructional design? An empirical study of the design process. Instructional Science 34, 481–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-3346-0

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Five-point-scale questionnaire ratings of the interventions by eight subjects. The peer review received an 'average score 4.0 on a five-point scale; standard deviation: 0.6', with one subject commenting it took place too early in the week.

"The subjects liked the peer review (average score 4.0 on a five-point scale; standard deviation: 0.6), although one subject commented that this activity took place too early in the week."

Verstegen 2006 (2)¶

Verstegen, D.M.L., Barnard, Y.F. & Pilot, A. (2006). Which events can cause iteration in instructional design? An empirical study of the design process. Instructional Science 34, 481–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-3346-0

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Same questionnaire ratings: subjects 'were less positive about the chat session (average score 3.1; standard deviation: 1.2)'. The authors observed the discussions were rather confused and difficult to follow, with no moderator or visual structure.

"The subjects were less positive about the chat session (average score 3.1; standard deviation: 1.2). Indeed the discussions were rather confused and difficult to follow"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Scheduled design cycles and peer review most successfully evoked iteration; the resources message and chat sessions were less successful — related
• Students rated the image decoding, poster sharing, and synthesis lecture components of a digital-images inquiry highest on a five-point feedback scale — related