Claims

Peer ultrasound teachers are typically fourth-year medical students about one year ahead of their students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Predominantly, peer teachers studied in their 4th year of medical school and on average one year further compared to their students. → Winter Lone 2024

Evidence

Winter Lone 2024

Winter Lone, Neubauer Ricarda, Weimer Johannes, Dietrich Christoph F., Wittek Agnes, Schiestl Lina, Marinova Milka, Schäfer Valentin Sebastian, Strizek Brigitte, Recker Florian. (2024). Peer teachers as ultrasound instructors? – a systematic literature review of peer teaching concepts in undergraduate ultrasound education. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06345-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

Descriptive synthesis of peer teacher characteristics across included studies. The review reports the median attendance in the 4th year and an average difference of 0.95 years between peer teachers and their taught students.

"Predominantly, peer teachers studied in their 4th year of medical school and on average one year further compared to their students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.