Claims

Peer-assisted ultrasound instruction is comparably effective to faculty-led instruction in most comparative studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among six comparative studies, five found peer-assisted learning comparably effective and one found it better than faculty-led courses. → Winter Lone 2024

Evidence

Winter Lone 2024

Winter Lone, Neubauer Ricarda, Weimer Johannes, Dietrich Christoph F., Wittek Agnes, Schiestl Lina, Marinova Milka, Schäfer Valentin Sebastian, Strizek Brigitte, Recker Florian. (2024). Peer teachers as ultrasound instructors? – a systematic literature review of peer teaching concepts in undergraduate ultrasound education. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06345-7

q2 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review synthesis of six comparative studies of peer- versus faculty-led undergraduate ultrasound courses. The review reports "five found peer-assisted learning to be comparably effective and one even better than faculty-led courses"; no pooled effect size is printed.

"Of six comparative studies, five found peer-assisted learning to be comparably effective and one even better than faculty-led courses."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.