Claims

Students drew mainly on peers and materials rather than adults as resources for spatial reasoning, using other students in 44 percent of resource-use instances and adults in 9 percent

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In making sense of FUSE challenges, students used a variety of social and material resources in coordination, with other students the most-used social resource (44 percent) and adults used infrequently (9 percent). → Ramey 2019

Evidence

Ramey 2019

Ramey, K. E., Stevens, R., & Uttal, D. H. (2019). In-FUSE-ing STEAM Learning with Spatial Reasoning: Distributed Spatial Sensemaking in School-based Making Activities. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000422

q2 · i? · qualitative · r?

Categorical coding of resource use during FUSE activities found "other students (44 percent of total instances of resource use) and adults (9 percent)". Percentages are descriptive; no test is reported.

"Social resources included other students (44 percent of total instances of resource use) and adults (9 percent). Material resources included help videos (10 percent), written instructions (7 percent), and diagrams from the FUSE website (3 percent), tinkering with physical or digital materials (28 percent), and sketching or working from sketches (1 percent)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id peers-over-adults-spatial-resources
title Students drew mainly on peers and materials rather than adults as resources for spatial reasoning, using other students in 44 percent of resource-use instances and adults in 9 percent
description Students drew mainly on peers and materials rather than adults as resources for spatial reasoning, using other students in 44 percent of resource-use instances and adults in 9 percent
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ramey-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.