Claims

Intervention caregivers reported increased confidence supporting children's math learning and stronger belief that media are tools for math learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Intervention caregivers reported significant increases in confidence to support math learning (96% vs 81%, p<.05) and in agreement that technology and media were tools for math learning (51% vs 28%, p<.05). → Silander 2016

Evidence

Silander 2016

Silander, M., Moorthy, S., Dominguez, X., Pasnik, S., & Llorente, C. (2016). Using Digital Media at Home to Promote Young Children's Mathematics Learning: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. SREE Spring 2016 Conference Abstract. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED567485

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Pre/post parent surveys in the RCT compared intervention and BAU caregivers; reported proportions favor the intervention on both confidence and attitudes toward media as math-learning tools, each p<.05.

"These caregivers also reported significant increases in their confidence to support math learning for their children, as compared to BAU caregivers (PBS KIDS: 96%; BAU: 81%; p<.05), as well as in their agreement that technology and media were tools for math learning (PBS KIDS: 51%; BAU: 28%; p<.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.