Post-test percentage scores rose on all eight tested communicative sub-skills under the multimedia package¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Table 1 reports higher percentage scores for the Interactive Multimedia Package than the conventional method on each of the eight tested skills, e.g. fluency in response 18.18 vs 6.24. → G. Singaravelu 2014
Evidence¶
G. Singaravelu 2014¶
G. Singaravelu. (2014). Efficacy of Multimedia Package in Communicative Skill in English. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, Vol. 4 No. 4, October - December. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068384
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive table of percentage scores for eight skills (fluency in response, narrating a story, skill of questioning, describe a picture, letter writing, reporting, essay writing, using appropriate words); the multimedia package percentages are higher on each listed skill. No statistical test is reported for these comparisons.
"The Table1 clarifies the percentage of scores in conventional method and innovative method as follows in Fluency in response, Narrating a story, Skill of questioning, Describe a picture, Letter writing, Reporting, Essay writing and Using appropriate words."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Communication Skills — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Percentage scores on all eight tested communicative skills were higher after the Interactive Multimedia Package than after conventional method — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Secondary students taught in an e-classroom with ICT resources significantly outperform students taught by conventional methods on post-test achievement — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.