Claims

Students most strongly endorsed the perceived advantages of mobile learning, with 70.3% responding positively to the advantages items

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On the seven advantages-of-M-learning items, 70.3% of respondents answered positively, 14.2% negatively and 15.3% neutrally. → Khrisat and Mahmoud 2013

Evidence

Khrisat and Mahmoud 2013

Abdulhafeth A. Khrisat & Salameh Saleem Mahmoud. (2013). Integrating Mobile Phones into the EFL Foundation Year Classroom in King Abdulaziz University/KSA: Effects on Achievement in General English and Students' Attitudes. English Language Teaching, 6(8). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n8p162

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive questionnaire results from the same forty-student sample, covering items on knowledge gain, flexibility of time and place, cost, and self-learning. The article reports "70.3% responded positively"; no inferential test is reported.

"A summary of the percentages of the seven items shows that 14.2% of the sample responded negatively to the seven items of the second subgroup that is “the advantages of using mobile phones in the EFL classroom", whereas 15.3% were neutral and 70.3% responded positively"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.