Performance-avoidance goals predict protective conflict regulation with a more-competent disagreeing partner, but not an equally competent one (Study 1)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Performance-avoidance goals predicted protective (compliant) regulation only when the partner was more competent (β = .38, p < .02, partial η² = .05), not when equally competent; the interaction was medium-sized (partial η² = .05). → Sommet 2015
q3 i2 The interaction between performance-avoidance goals and partner competence on self-reported protective regulation was significant in Study 1. → Sommet 2015
Evidence¶
Sommet 2015¶
Sommet, N., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2015). To Confirm or to Conform? Performance Goals as a Regulator of Conflict With More-Competent Others. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 580–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037240
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Same Study 1 sample of 139 university students; self-reported protective regulation measured with three items (e.g., compliance with partner's proposition). The predicted interaction was significant with partial η² = .05 (a medium effect by the η² convention), the simple slope significant only in the superior-competence partner condition.
"As expected, the interac- tion between performance-avoidance goals and partner’s compe- tence was significant, /H9252/H11005.25, F(1, 129) /H110056.65, p /H11021.02, /H9257p2 /H11005 .05. When the partner was presented as being more competent, the higher the performance-avoidance goals, the higher the protective"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Achievement Goal Orientation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Manipulated performance-approach (vs. avoidance) goals increase preference for a self-confirmatory model over a compliant one with a more-competent partner (Study 2) — related
- Performance-approach goals predict competitive conflict regulation with a more-competent disagreeing partner, but not an equally competent one (Study 1) — related
- With explicit competence feedback, performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals predict competitive and protective regulation respectively when partner competence is higher or unspecified, but not equal (Study 3) — related
- Performance goals regulate conflict with more-competent others toward competitive (approach) or protective (avoidance) interpersonal behavior — a broader claim this one bears on
- Manipulated performance-approach (vs. avoidance) goals increase preference for a self-confirmatory model over a compliant one with a more-competent partner (Study 2) — related
- Performance goals predict assertion of one's own competence after a real sociocognitive conflict — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
performance-avoidance-goals-protective-regulation-more-competent-partner |
aliases |
pav-goals-protective-regulation-more-competent-partner-study1 |
title |
Performance-avoidance goals predict protective conflict regulation with a more-competent disagreeing partner, but not an equally competent one (Study 1) |
description |
Performance-avoidance goals predict protective conflict regulation with a more-competent disagreeing partner, but not an equally competent one (Study 1) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sommet-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.