Claims

Dispositional performance goals negatively predict memory self-efficacy in younger and older adults

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2011 · checked against its sources 2026-10-17 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 Participants higher in dispositional performance goals reported lower memory self-efficacy (β = −.22, p<.01). → Hastings 2011

Evidence

Hastings 2011

Hastings, E. C., & West, R. L. (2011). Goal orientation and self-efficacy in relation to memory in adulthood. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 18(4), 471-493. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2011.575926

q2 · i2 · associational · r2

Path from the final SEM of the pooled sample (N=216). Goals and demographics together "explained 16.9% of the variance in memory self-efficacy in the final model".

"Performance goals had a negative effect on memory self-efficacy (β= −.22, p<.01), such that participants higher in general dispositional performance goals reported lower memory self-efficacy."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id performance-goals-predict-lower-memory-self-efficacy
title Dispositional performance goals negatively predict memory self-efficacy in younger and older adults
description Dispositional performance goals negatively predict memory self-efficacy in younger and older adults
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2011
source_checked 2026-10-17
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — hastings-2011

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.