Claims

In the PFS ADHD-risk subsample, 54% of intervention children versus 11% of controls responded or improved by teacher-rated clinical criteria

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Fourteen intervention children (54%) responded or improved versus two control children (11%), χ2 = 8.99, p = .002, OR = 9.9 [1.9, 51.9]. → Feil 2016

Evidence

Feil 2016

Feil, E. G., Small, J. W., Seeley, J. R., Walker, H. M., Golly, A., Frey, A., & Forness, S. R. (2016). Early intervention for preschoolers at risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Preschool First Step to Success. Behavioral Disorders, 41(2), 95-106. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581149

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Responder analysis using Jacobson and Truax's Reliable Change Index with a CADS cutoff at T = 59, based on teacher report in the 45-child subsample (26 intervention, 19 control). The article reports "OR[95% CI] 5 9.9[1.9, 51.9]"; responding children averaged a 2 SD improvement in CADS scores. No standardized effect size (d, g, r) is printed for this contrast.

"Overall, 14 intervention children (54%) either responded or improved after participating in the PFS intervention compared to two children (11%) in the control condition ( χ2 5 8.99, p 5 .002, OR[95% CI] 5 9.9[1.9, 51.9])."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.