Claims

More than a third of preschoolers screened for externalizing behavior in the PFS trial also met criteria as at risk for comorbid ADHD, and differed from nonidentified peers at baseline

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? 45 of 126 children (35%) met the dual-informant CADS cutoff of 1 SD or more above the mean, and identified versus nonidentified children differed significantly on five of 10 baseline measures. → Feil 2016

Evidence

Feil 2016

Feil, E. G., Small, J. W., Seeley, J. R., Walker, H. M., Golly, A., Frey, A., & Forness, S. R. (2016). Early intervention for preschoolers at risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Preschool First Step to Success. Behavioral Disorders, 41(2), 95-106. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581149

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Retrospective subgroup construction using parent and teacher Conners' ADHD Scales total scores at 1 SD or more above the mean; the article reports "45 of the 126 children participating in the efficacy trial (35%) met criteria". Only t statistics are printed, no effect sizes.

"the identified and nonidentified children differed significantly on five of 10 baseline measures and approached significance ( p , .10) on three other baseline measures."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.