Claims

By parent report, 62% of intervention children versus 21% of controls responded or improved on ADHD symptom criteria

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Sixteen intervention children (62%) responded or improved versus four control children (21%), χ2 = 9.29, p = .002, OR = 8.7 [2.0, 37.4]. → Feil 2016

Evidence

Feil 2016

Feil, E. G., Small, J. W., Seeley, J. R., Walker, H. M., Golly, A., Frey, A., & Forness, S. R. (2016). Early intervention for preschoolers at risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Preschool First Step to Success. Behavioral Disorders, 41(2), 95-106. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581149

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Parent-report responder analysis on the same subsample using the RCI/CADS criteria; four intervention and two control children lacked parent-reported CADS data at postintervention. The article reports "OR[95% CI] 5 8.7[2.0, 37.4]". No standardized effect size (d, g, r) is printed for this contrast.

"Overall, 16 children (62%) in the intervention condition responded or im proved based on parent report, whereas only four children (21%) in the control condition responded or improved ( χ2 5 9.29, p 5 .002, OR[95% CI] 5 8.7[2.0, 37.4])."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.