Claims

A multifaceted EBM course for pharmacy students significantly improved overall EBM test scores (11.4 vs. 12.6, P<0.0001)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A one-day multifaceted intervention (students' presentations, lectures, and small group discussions) showed a significant improvement in overall scores on the EBM test: 11.4 (0.29) vs. 12.6 (0.22), P<0.0001. → Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Evidence

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos, Patelarou Athina, Laliotis Aggelos, Wan Andrew C, Matalliotakis Michail, Tsiou Chrysoula, Patelarou Evridiki. (2016). Educational strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066070/

q3 · i? · review · r3

Pre-post evaluation of a one-day multifaceted EBM workshop for pharmacy students (n=37) in Japan. Overall EBM test scores improved from 11.4 (0.29) to 12.6 (0.22), P<0.0001, as reported in the review's synthesis.

"Another study conducted in Japan among pharmacy students was designed as one-day MI (students’ presentations, lectures, and small group discussions) and findings showed a significant improvement in the overall scores on the EBM test: 11.4 (0.29) vs. 12.6 (0.22), P<0.0001) [17]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.