Claims

Per-exercise analysis accuracy improved from 15 of 27 exercises above 80% to all 27 above 80% in the third version

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the third version, all 27 exercises were analysed correctly more than 80% of the time, with 16 exercises at 100% accuracy. → Weragama 2014

Evidence

Weragama 2014

Weragama, D. & Reye, J. (2014). Analysing Student Programs in the PHP Intelligent Tutoring System. Int J Artif Intell Educ 24:162–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0014-z

q2 · i? · design · r2

Re-analysis of previously incorrectly analysed programs using the third version of the knowledge base. Figure 17 reports per-exercise accuracy; "All 27 exercises were now analysed correctly more than 80 % of the time".

"It can be seen that the analysis accuracy has increased markedly to 96.31 %. All 27 exercises were now analysed correctly more than 80 % of the time and 16 exercises were analysed accurately 100 % of the time."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id php-its-per-exercise-accuracy-improvement
title Per-exercise analysis accuracy improved from 15 of 27 exercises above 80% to all 27 above 80% in the third version
description Per-exercise analysis accuracy improved from 15 of 27 exercises above 80% to all 27 above 80% in the third version
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2014
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — weragama-2014

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.