Teaching reading with picture story books improved reading comprehension in first-year Paket B students at PKBM Medaso Kolaka¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group's reading comprehension improved significantly from pre-test to post-test after treatment with picture story books. → Roslina 2017
Evidence¶
Roslina 2017¶
Roslina. (2017). The Effect of Picture Story Books on Students’ Reading Comprehension. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 8(2). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.2p.213
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Paired pre-test/post-test comparison of the 15-student experimental group taught with picture story books. The mean rose from 61.8 to 75.3, a "mean difference" of 13.46673 with standard deviation 7.30753; the article reports the paired test as significant.
"In pre test, this group means score is 61.8 then it is being improved to be 75.3 in post -test. The mean difference is calculating as well as 75.33333 – 61.8666 =13.46673 while it standard deviation is 7.30753."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The experimental and control groups differed significantly in reading performance before the treatment — related
- The control group also improved from pre-test to post-test under conventional teaching, but less than the experimental group — related
- Students held strongly positive perceptions of picture story books in reading class — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.