The experimental and control groups differed significantly in reading performance before the treatment¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? At pre-test the experimental group (mean 61.8) scored significantly higher than the control group (mean 46.4). → Roslina 2017

Evidence¶

Roslina 2017¶

Roslina. (2017). The Effect of Picture Story Books on Students’ Reading Comprehension. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 8(2). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.2p.213

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Between-group comparison of pre-test scores of the two 15-student groups. The article reports t-observed 2.653 exceeding t-table 2,048 with Sig. (2-tailed) 0,009, concluding the groups "show different performance" prior to treatment.

"the researcher also found that the t -observed is 2.653 and the t -table is 2,048 at 0.05 levels, where T -observed > T- table, α = 0.05. In addition, the Sig. (2 -tailed) is 0,009"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Teaching reading with picture story books improved reading comprehension in first-year Paket B students at PKBM Medaso Kolaka — related
• Before implementation, treatment students performed significantly below control students on the standardized reading test — reports the opposite
• Experimental and control pupils showed equivalent reading ability at pre-test — reports the opposite
• Elementary students in blended learning schools using Core5 obtained significantly higher posttest reading scores than control students after controlling for pretest differences — related