PLS simulator is the most commonly used pediatric MIS training model, with construct validity established for its pattern-cutting task¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery (PLS) simulator was the most commonly used model, appearing in 7 of 20 studies, with construct validity established for its pattern-cutting task through modified scoring metrics. → Zahradníková Petra 2025
Evidence¶
Zahradníková Petra 2025¶
Zahradníková Petra, Babala Jozef, Lindák Martin, Pechanová Rebeka, Hnilicová Silvia, Molnár Marián, Nedomová Barbora, Poš Lucie, Dotlačil Vojtěch, Kučerová Barbora. (2025). Systematic review of the training process of minimally invasive surgery in neonates and infants. Pediatric Surgery International. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-025-06095-7
q2 · i? · review · r2
Systematic review synthesis of 20 studies describing 9 neonatal/infant simulation models. The review reports the PLS simulator "was by far the most commonly used, appearing in 7 studies" and that construct validity was established for its pattern-cutting task.
"The Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery Simulators (PLS) were by far the most commonly used, appearing in 7 studies, while 3D-printed synthetic models were used in 5 studies. Preliminary data from Nasr et al. [8], Azzie et al. [14] and Retrosi et al. [15] suggest that PLS simulator remains the only validated tool for pediatric MIS, with construct validity established for its pattern-cutting task through modified scoring metrics that improved differentiation among skill levels."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Systematic review of 72 studies finds no universal MIS training model for neonates and infants, supporting structured proficiency-based curricula — a broader claim this one bears on
- Most reviewed simulation studies demonstrated face and content validity, but few assessed construct or predictive validity — related
- Weisser et al. 3D-printed pediatric MIS curriculum: expert surgeons outperformed residents on all tasks with high interrater reliability — related
- Prior basic SuSiPed training significantly increases performance on the more advanced pediatric MIS simulator (SuSiPed 2.0) — related
- 3D-printed pediatric chest model with embedded force sensors distinguished skill levels where a conventional box trainer did not — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.