Claims

PLS simulator is the most commonly used pediatric MIS training model, with construct validity established for its pattern-cutting task

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery (PLS) simulator was the most commonly used model, appearing in 7 of 20 studies, with construct validity established for its pattern-cutting task through modified scoring metrics. → Zahradníková Petra 2025

Evidence

Zahradníková Petra 2025

Zahradníková Petra, Babala Jozef, Lindák Martin, Pechanová Rebeka, Hnilicová Silvia, Molnár Marián, Nedomová Barbora, Poš Lucie, Dotlačil Vojtěch, Kučerová Barbora. (2025). Systematic review of the training process of minimally invasive surgery in neonates and infants. Pediatric Surgery International. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-025-06095-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

Systematic review synthesis of 20 studies describing 9 neonatal/infant simulation models. The review reports the PLS simulator "was by far the most commonly used, appearing in 7 studies" and that construct validity was established for its pattern-cutting task.

"The Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery Simulators (PLS) were by far the most commonly used, appearing in 7 studies, while 3D-printed synthetic models were used in 5 studies. Preliminary data from Nasr et al. [8], Azzie et al. [14] and Retrosi et al. [15] suggest that PLS simulator remains the only validated tool for pediatric MIS, with construct validity established for its pattern-cutting task through modified scoring metrics that improved differentiation among skill levels."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.