Claims

Reporting the number of points possible for each metric led to better understanding of how the STAR score is calculated

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Displaying the number of points possible for each metric improved users' understanding of how the score is calculated. → Jesse Chandler 2021

Evidence

Jesse Chandler 2021

Jesse Chandler, Jacob Hartog, Erin Lipman, Jonathan Gellar. (2021). The Effect of School Report Card Design on Usability, Understanding, and Satisfaction. Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Design-comparison study of the DC school report card. The study reports that "reporting the number of points possible for each metric led to a better understanding of how the score is calculated."

"reporting the number of points possible for each metric led to a better understanding of how the score is calculated"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id points-possible-improves-score-understanding
title Reporting the number of points possible for each metric led to better understanding of how the STAR score is calculated
description Reporting the number of points possible for each metric led to better understanding of how the STAR score is calculated
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — jesse-chandler-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.