Positive Action has positive effects on elementary school students' behavior, with a WWC domain average effect size of 0.51 and an improvement index of +19 percentile points¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr?·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Across two studies meeting WWC standards, the average effect size for behavior outcomes was statistically significant, favoring the intervention group. → WWC Intervention Report: Positive Action 2007
Evidence¶
WWC Intervention Report: Positive Action 2007¶
WWC Intervention Report: Positive Action. (2007). What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. http://www.positiveaction.net
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r?
WWC aggregation of behavior-domain findings from one randomized controlled trial (Flay et al., 2006) and one quasi-experimental study (Flay & Allred, 2003), covering 56 schools and over 2,660 students. The printed "Domain average8 across studies 0.51" is an average effect size of 0.51 (a medium effect), yielding an improvement index of +19 percentile points, and the WWC rated the domain as having positive effects.
"Domain average8 across studies 0.51 na +19"
Studies bearing on this claim¶
Do schoolwide character-education programmes change students' behaviour, and do they also move knowledge, attitudes, values and achievement? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 7 narrower claims that bear on it: 2 distinct studies (2 quant-synthesis), q2–q3, 1 of 2 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.
| Study | Design | Effect as recorded | Bears on this claim through |
|---|---|---|---|
| WWC Intervention Report: Positive Action 2007 | q3 · quant-synthesis · r? | i2; i1; i? | this claim; In the Hawaii randomized trial, Positive Action reduced serious violence among boys but no (qualifies); Positive Action has positive effects on elementary school students' academic achievement, (supports); In the Hawaii randomized trial, Positive Action showed no statistically significant effect (qualifies) |
| What Works Clearinghouse 2007 | q2 · quant-synthesis · r1 | i? | The Child Development Project/CSC shows potentially positive effects on student behavior, (supports); CSC/CDP shows no discernible effects on knowledge, attitudes, and values (qualifies); CSC/CDP shows no discernible effects on academic achievement (qualifies); Statistically significant effects reported by the CDP studies were not statistically signi (qualifies) |
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The average effect across all four behavior outcome measures in the Page & D'Agostino study is positive and statistically significant (effect size 0.40) — related
- The WWC's extent of evidence for Positive Action is moderate to large for behavior and academic achievement, with no qualifying studies addressing knowledge, attitudes, and values — a broader claim this one bears on
- Positive Action has positive effects on elementary school students' academic achievement, with a WWC domain average effect size of 0.37 and an improvement index of +14 percentile points — related
- The Child Development Project/CSC shows potentially positive effects on student behavior, with an average improvement index of +8 percentile points — related
- Too Good for Drugs has potentially positive effects on student behavior, with a WWC-computed domain average effect size of 0.25 that is not statistically significant — related
- The WWC rates Project CRISS® as having potentially positive effects on comprehension for adolescent learners, with an average improvement index of +20 percentile points — related
- Growth Mindset interventions have potentially positive effects on postsecondary academic achievement (improvement index +13) — related
- WWC rates MTP-S as having potentially positive effects on general achievement, with a small extent of evidence — related
- In the Hawaii randomized trial, Positive Action reduced serious violence among boys but not among girls — related
- In the Hawaii randomized trial, Positive Action significantly reduced grade retention, with an effect size of 1.09 and an improvement index of +36 — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- In the Hawaii randomized trial, Positive Action showed no statistically significant effects on state standardized test scores in reading and math — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
positive-action-positive-effects-behavior |
title |
Positive Action has positive effects on elementary school students' behavior, with a WWC domain average effect size of 0.51 and an improvement index of +19 percentile points |
description |
Positive Action has positive effects on elementary school students' behavior, with a WWC domain average effect size of 0.51 and an improvement index of +19 percentile points |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — wwc-intervention-report-positive-action-2007 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.