Claims

Trainees and observers reported generally positive experiences with seven tools in 10 studies (Kirkpatrick level 1)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Trainees and observers reported their experiences as generally positive for seven tools in 10 studies (21%). → Okuyama Ayako 2011

Evidence

Okuyama Ayako 2011

Okuyama Ayako, Martowirono Kartinie, Bijnen Bart. (2011). Assessing the patient safety competencies of healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMJ Quality & Safety. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203526/

q3 · i? · review · r3

The review's outcomes synthesis, using a modified Kirkpatrick hierarchy, reports that "Trainees and observers reported their experiences as being generally positive (Kirkpatrick level 1)" for seven tools in 10 studies. Only one selected article (2.1%) referred to implementation cost of competency assessment.

"Trainees and observers reported their experiences as being generally positive (Kirkpatrick level 1) for seven tools in 10 studies (21%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.