Claims

Included orthodontic simulation studies evaluated outcomes only at Kirkpatrick reaction and learning levels, never at behaviour or results levels

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Of the 16 included publications, two experiments reported positive learning outcomes at the learning level and four studies reported outcome evaluation at the reaction level. → SIPIYARUK Kawin 2023 q3 i? None of the included articles evaluated learning outcomes at the behaviour or results levels of the Kirkpatrick model. → SIPIYARUK Kawin 2023 (2)

Evidence

SIPIYARUK Kawin 2023

SIPIYARUK Kawin, KAEWSIRIRAT Prachworrakit, SANTIWONG Peerapong. (2023). Technology-enhanced simulation-based learning in orthodontic education: A scoping review. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.3.e2321354.oar

q3 · i? · review · r3

The review's own synthesis classifying all 16 included publications by Kirkpatrick outcome-evaluation level, finding evaluations only at reaction and learning levels across the corpus.

"When considering the 16 included publications according to the Kirkpatrick model, 40 two experiments reported positive learning outcomes from the evaluation at a learning level. 27 , 30 Four studies positively demonstrated the outcome evaluation focusing on a reaction level."

SIPIYARUK Kawin 2023 (2)

SIPIYARUK Kawin, KAEWSIRIRAT Prachworrakit, SANTIWONG Peerapong. (2023). Technology-enhanced simulation-based learning in orthodontic education: A scoping review. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.3.e2321354.oar

q3 · i? · review · r3

The review reports that across all 16 included articles no study evaluated outcomes at the behaviour or results levels, which the authors call significant impact levels of simulation development.

"None of the articles performed the evaluation of learning outcomes at behaviour and results levels."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.