The experimental group's academic achievement rose significantly from pre-test to post-test under activity-based poster teaching¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Within the experimental group, post-test scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores (t = 9.19, p < 0.05). → Coşkun and Eker 2018
Evidence¶
Coşkun and Eker 2018¶
İsmail Coşkun, Cevat Eker. (2018). The Effect of Teaching Activities Done by Using Activity Based Posters on the Students' Academic Achievements, Retention Levels in Their Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(4): 585-597. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060402
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Paired comparison of the experimental group's pre-test (mean 9.63, SS = 4.38) and post-test (mean 19.8, SS = 4.71) on the 25-item Celebrities Achievement Test, n = 30. The article reports a significant difference with t = 9.19 and p < 0.05, calling the poster teaching "positively efficient in the success of the student". Note the article's sentence says control group but the table and section are the experimental group.
"The difference between the pre- test and post-test scores of the control group was compared with the t test and it was found there was a significant difference with the value obtained (t = 9.19) and p <0.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students taught with activity-based posters scored significantly higher on a retention test 21 days after the post-test than the control group — related
- The control group's academic achievement also rose significantly from pre-test to post-test under guidebook-based teaching — related
- Experimental-group achievement rose significantly from pre- to post-test while the control group's gain was not significant — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The experimental group's achievement scores rose significantly from pre-test to post-test under the technology-supported program — related
- Within the experimental group, achievement rose significantly from pre-test to post-test, while the control group's gain was not statistically significant — related
- Experimental group also scored higher than control group on post-test academic achievement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.