Descriptively, the experimental group's posttest intercultural sensitivity mean (99.20) was higher than the control group's (89.27), with both groups starting at moderate levels¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Comparing arithmetic means of scale scores, the experimental group reached a higher posttest level of intercultural sensitivity perception than the control group; these are descriptive means with no effect size reported for this contrast. → Tuncel 2019

Evidence¶

Tuncel 2019¶

Tuncel, İ. (2019). The effectiveness of intercultural sensitivity development activities integrated with scientific research methods course. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.301

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive statistics from Table 4 for 43 experimental and 43 control students: pretest means of 87.04 and 87.93 were moderate, and the posttest means were 99.20 (experimental) versus 89.27 (control).

"the students in the experimental group ( x =99.20) had a higher level of intercultural sensitivity perception than the control group ( x =89.27) when the arithmetic means of the scores obtained from the intercultural sensitivity scale were compared."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In a quasi-experiment with pretest-posttest and control group, intercultural sensitivity development activities integrated with a scientific research methods course produced a significantly greater pretest-posttest change in intercultural sensitivity than the standard course — related
• At the beginning of the semester, experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in intercultural sensitivity scale scores — related