At the beginning of the semester, experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in intercultural sensitivity scale scores¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? An independent samples t-test found no statistically significant pretest difference between the experimental and control groups, t(84)=.420, p>.05; equivalence was not tested. → Tuncel 2019

Evidence¶

Tuncel 2019¶

Tuncel, İ. (2019). The effectiveness of intercultural sensitivity development activities integrated with scientific research methods course. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.301

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Independent samples t-test comparing pretest mean scores of the 43-student experimental group (87.04) and 43-student control group (87.93); no significant difference, t(84)=.420, p>.05, indicating statistically comparable starting levels.

"it is seen that there is not any statistically significant difference in the students’ intercultural sensitivity scale pretest scores for both the experimental and the control group, t(84)=.420, p>.05."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In a quasi-experiment with pretest-posttest and control group, intercultural sensitivity development activities integrated with a scientific research methods course produced a significantly greater pretest-posttest change in intercultural sensitivity than the standard course — related
• Descriptively, the experimental group's posttest intercultural sensitivity mean (99.20) was higher than the control group's (89.27), with both groups starting at moderate levels — related