Claims

In a quasi-experiment with pretest-posttest and control group, intercultural sensitivity development activities integrated with a scientific research methods course produced a significantly greater pretest-posttest change in intercultural sensitivity than the standard course

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The change from pretest to posttest differed significantly between the experimental and control groups (Group*Test interaction, F(1,84)=48.84, p<.05), favoring the integrated-activities group; no effect size is printed in the quoted finding sentence. → Tuncel 2019

Evidence

Tuncel 2019

Tuncel, İ. (2019). The effectiveness of intercultural sensitivity development activities integrated with scientific research methods course. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.301

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Two-way ANOVA for mixed measures on Intercultural Sensitivity Scale pretest-posttest scores of 43 experimental and 43 control students; the Group*Test interaction was significant, F(1, 84) = 48.84, p<.05. Table 6 separately lists a partial eta squared of .368 for this interaction.

"It is ascertained that the change in the successive (iterative) measurements (pretest and posttest scores) is significant with regard to procedure groups (as experimental and control): F (1, 84) = 48.84, p<.05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.